Climate Action May Impact Dividend Growth

B. Scott Sadler, CFA -- President, Boardwalk Capital Management

Out-of-control firestorms in Colorado and 100-degree heat index in the nation's capital served as an apt backdrop for an important court ruling on climate risk... And an important marker for investors that their world is changing in ways they may not yet understand.

Earlier this week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia found that the EPA's interpretation of the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide regulations is "unambiguously correct." The three-judge panel unanimously agreed with the Environmental Protection Agency's finding that carbon dioxide is a public danger.

According to David Doniger of the Natural Resources Defense Council, "These rulings clear the way for EPA to keep moving forward under the Clean Air Act to limit carbon pollution from motor vehicles, new power plants, and other big industrial sources."

Three Characteristics of Responsible Corporate Citizens

This post authored by Daniel Baylis, Director of Content for N/A (the actual name). It appears courtesy of FastCompany.com.

To be "good" in the past meant a variety of things. Perhaps a company's product made people's lives easier. Or maybe they provided jobs in economically challenging times. But chances are the environmental effects of manufacturing were never considered, and overseas production was a financially intelligent decision free from ethical implications. Big businesses and marketing agencies were focused on selling the American Dream. Problematic environmental and social consequences hadn't yet come on the radar.

In the 1970s, a new marketing movement was born. It was called "cause marketing" and it matched for-profit businesses with charitable endeavors. Over the next few decades, the measure of doing good was how much your foundation gave to cancer, AIDS, dolphins, or any other topical issue. Cause marketing had its tangible benefits, but would prove to be trendy and lacking actual commitment.

Today there is an increased consumer value in supporting businesses that don't simply do well, but that do good. Cultural values are shifting, and this sea change is catalyzing corporations to revisit the choices they are making. And this will continue. But we are far from a world where corporations are making choices based upon the triple-bottom line: profits, people, and planet.

Managing the Unmeasurable -- Where are My Risks?

B. Scott Sadler, CFA -- President, Boardwalk Capital Management

Investors for decades have equated risk with volatility. But as we learned in the economic crisis of 2008-09, unseen and external factors can wreak havoc on portfolios. 


So, what do we investors do with our newfound concern over risk? 


If the past is any guide, we dutifully build our concern over those past risks into our portfolio thoughts and allocations (knowing full well that the past seldom repeats itself in exactly the same way...)

THAT is a recipe for failure.

So, what risks are we missing?  What actions should we be taking now to protect from those risks?

There is a new school of thought called Integrated Risk analysis that refuses to ignore risks just because we can't quantify them.


Take ecological risk:  We know that society is consuming more of the earth's resources than it can replenish.  Our activities are even inhibiting the planet's ability to produce at the earlier rate and same cost.  And we are painfully learning that the available quantities of potable water and arable land are insufficient to support the growth forecasts that underpin our valuations.

Something in this equation is incorrect -- either valuations or growth -- and as fiduciaries, we have a responsibility to manage this risk.

THIS is What "Serious About Sustainability" Looks Like

If you are a company who wants to do business with the big guys, you often to have do it their way. Today, that can mean doing business sustainably.  Large companies are held accountable for the impact of their suppliers.  So, those suppliers must play by the new rules of the game. 

In other words, it just got serious.

As a sustainable investor, you may feel good knowing that your portfolio companies are moving the needle on environmental issues.  But have you considered the risk that your small cap investments may become increasingly uncompetitive if they can't meet these increasingly higher standards? 

There is a real risk that the measurement and documentation of these issues may render some firms "out of the loop" when it comes to earning the business of a Procter and Gamble or a Microsoft.

Water Stress: A World Wide Problem

Sustainable investors should be particularly concerned about how their portfolio holdings are addressing one of the most critical issues of our time:  Water.
 

Unsustainable water use is threatening agriculture, other business and populations in China, India and the US, according to a study by risk analysis company Maplecroft.  Companies who fail to manage this issue stand to lose sales, and even the right to operate in certain countries.

Boardwalk Portfolios: Top Rankings for Ethics and Climate

Last month, global watchdog Ethisphere released its World's Most Ethical Companies list.  This month, research firm Maplecroft disclosed its Climate Innovation Index.  In both cases, Boardwalk's model portfolio holdings were well represented.

Among those considered most ethical, General Electric and Starbucks have made the grade for all six years of the study's existence. 

UPS, Cisco, Intel, Alcoa, and Pepsico were also among the domestic honorees in our models, while Accenture (Ireland), National Grid (UK) and Westpac Banking (Australia) were among the foreign holdings recognized.

The Carbon Innovation Index recognizes companies who "successfully innovate and manage climate-related opportunities and risks and are better equipped to operate in this future growth environment." Many of the same "ethical" companies are also making a serious effort to prepare for climate change.  Boardwalk holdings GE, Alcoa, Intel, Hess, Praxair and Ford are among the top ten ranked firms.

For more on the Boardwalk model portfolios click Global ESG Titans or ESG 50 USA.

Mounting Challenges for the World's Food Supply

With an expanding and increasingly urban, meat consuming world population, how will farming co-exist with climate change and water/energy/land scarcity?

Agriculture already consumes 70% of the world's water supply.  And by 2030, farmers will need 45% more water to feed the almost 9 billion people on the planet by then.  Where will it come from? 

Meanwhile, food production, and getting food to the consumer, both use vast amounts of energy.  And traditional energy sources aren't getting cheaper.  These inputs, and more volatile weather, are resulting in large fluctuations in food prices.  And as the author points out, this has often been associated with social unrest.

As a society, how will we deal with this issue?

There is much food for thought in the attached article from Environmental Leader.  Well worth a read.